The Texas judge
who threw out the Obama administration’s rule on overtime exempt status needn’t
have bothered, had he? The Trump administration wasn’t going to let it stand
anyway, right? Not with the Republican Congress on his side!
The legal basis
for throwing the rule out doesn’t concern me here. My question-is, who are the
losers and who the gainers by the new rule, which was supposed to have gone
into effect next year? Specifically, aren’t some of the losers Trump
proletarians, working class, uneducated, white voters, many from rural
counties? But if the gainers are Establishment Republicans, here lies a
contradiction.
The rule would
raise the annual earnings floor for overtime exempt status from about $23,000
to about $47,000. Who would be affected? Under current law, for example, the
owner of a gas station or convenience store can make somebody a manager, that
is, exempt by definition of their job duties, and as long as he or she makes at
least $23,000 annually, the owner doesn’t have to pay them overtime. They do
have to be replaced if they get tired of the extra hours. But they’re not
irreplaceable.
One way to think
about this is that, under the new rule, not just the working poor, but the
whole of the lower two quintiles of earners would have to be paid overtime
under federal law when they work more than 40 hours a week, regardless of their
job responsibilities. The middle quintile begins with earners making $41,187 annually;
the mean earnings in the second lowest quintile is $31,087 (2014 data).
Another way is to
think again about convenience store clerks. Every town in the little red
counties Trump carried all across the country – over 2,000 of them – has a gas
station or convenience store even if it has nothing else. The managers and
assistant managers of those stores might make enough to be overtime exempt
under the old rule, which dates to 2002. But maybe not under the Obama rule.
Presumably some of them are among the
new Republican voters Trump brought into the party. Whether being working class
makes the service industry proletarian may be debated. They work for an hourly
wage like proletarians, but it is a little harder to see how their services generate
surplus value for accumulation to capital the way labor does in manufacturing.
But that’s not
essential to the argument that there’s a contradiction either. What’s the worst
fear of an hourly worker in the second quintile? Joining the working poor in
the lowest quintile. Rejecting the Obama rule does nothing to remove that
working class fear.
But it does
permit the owner of the enterprise to put what he might have paid in overtime
back towards the accumulation of capital. That is, the owner’s bourgeois class
interests are in contradiction with those of the worker – the so-called
manager.
The more gas
stations and convenience stores owned, the bigger the bourgeois, and the bigger
the class interest. Until you find yourself in the McDonald’s Corporation boardroom
with the Establishment Republican elite, or some other place where the
contradiction between working class fears and the interests of the shareholders
looms large.
Here’s another
fine mess Trump has got his party into!
Originally posted in Economic Populist, A Community Site for Economics Freaks and Geeks, on November 30, 2016.
No comments:
Post a Comment